The Dahiya Doctrine: Israel’s Military Strategy of Civilian Infrastructure Destruction

In Brief - 

Destruction as doctrine. In Israeli military strategy, the deliberate, disproportionate attack on civilian life is a purposeful means of coercing people to turn against Israel’s adversaries. The Dahiya Doctrine - named after the Lebanese town where it was first deployed- is designed to kill innocent people, use collective punishment, is a violation of international law, and furthermore, never achieves its state goal. But sometimes assumed victory, as journalist Philip C. Winslow wrote, is simply to see the other side suffer.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is the Dahiya Doctrine?

The Dahiya Doctrine, a primary tool of Israeli military strategy, calls for the intentional, disproportionate destruction and annihilation of civilian infrastructure. Designed as a form of psychological warfare, its blueprint asserts that collective punishment of a civilian population within an enemy “stronghold” will serve as discouragement against continued support of a militant group by that civilian population. 

It was first implemented during the 2006 Israeli assault on Southern Lebanon by former Israeli military General and later Chief of Staff of the Israeli Military Gadi Eisenkot. Its name found its roots in the Lebanese suburb of Dahiya, a town flattened by Israeli bombs, which was originally a stronghold for Hezbollah. The doctrine’s official onset came in 2008 with Eisenkot's famous words, “We will apply disproportionate force on it (village) and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases… This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved.” Since then, the Dahiya Doctrine continues to guide the behavior of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) – seen today across Gaza, Lebanon, and some reported regions of Syria. 

Its strategy uses Domicide, carried out through airstrikes, with additional support of ground methods through tanks and bulldozers. 

The Dahiya Doctrine asserts that if enough psychological terror and physical distress is imposed on a civilian population, eventually the civilian population will turn on its own through rebellion - In southern Lebanon, this being Hezbollah, in Gaza, this being Hamas. This rebellion will then further assist in Israeli’s military goals - an Israeli hope for capitulation through collective punishment. 

Violations of International Law & it’s lack of workability

Under international law, the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure, as well as usage of collective punishment to achieve military gain, is highly illegal and amounts to war crimes. As articulated in the Fourth Geneva Convention, “The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.” Simultaneously, The Rome Statute, under Article 8 of the International Criminal Court (ICC) proclaims a war crime as, “the intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities.” 

Attempts to turn a civilian population against itself through violent military attacks have always failed, instead having the opposite effect in strengthening unity within the country. These tactics are currently deployed in Iran under the assumption that the civilian population will turn on the Iranian Government. However we only see an increased sense of nationalism, prompting a "rallying around the flag” effect - only invigorating the population against the outside enemy further. Famously, During the 1940 German Blitz, cities across Britain were heavily bombed by Germany in an effort to break civilian morale and force surrender. Instead, the opposite happened - the population became more unified, with an increased sense of nationalism uniting the British population against Nazi Germany. All evidence shows that this strategy has never worked. It only results in millions of deaths, and an increased hatred towards the outside source inflicting undue suffering.

Due to countless war crimes inflicted, arrest warrants have been issued by the ICC against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Natanyahu and other members of his cabinet, with prosecutor Karim Khan citing crimes including “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, willfully causing great suffering, serious injury to body or health or cruel treatment, willful killing or murder, and intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population, as well as crimes against humanity of extermination and /or murder, persecution, and allegations of crimes of committing other inhuman acts.” 

Dahiya Doctrine in Action

In both Gaza and Lebanon, the IDF has repeatedly dropped 1,000 and 2,000-pound bombs in urban areas and cluster munition bombs causing widespread destruction. The simple geography of both Gaza and Lebanon would make it impossible to target simply combatants while using these weapons. What’s worse, Israel asserts the usage of Dahiya Doctrine tactics as vital for its “national security interests,” being a centerpiece strategy to the dissolution of Gaza beginning in 2023.

Satellite images of Gaza show it flattened after an over two year genocidal campaign. Nearly 80-percent of Gaza has been decimated, with confirmation of the systematic destruction of schools, hospitals, civilian high rise apartment complexes, water infrastructure, mosques, churches, and media outlets flooding media streams daily. Conservative reports confirm at least 80,000 Palestinians have been slaughtered, a vast majority innocent, with almost 200,000 injured. 

Simultaneously, on April 9th, Lebanon endured a heinous attack from Israel causing the deaths of almost 400 people, and injuring ~2,000 in a span of 10 minutes through air attack. Plumes of smoke were seen across the entire sky line of central Beirut, and reports of constant ambulance sirens were heard through the city for hours as panic reverberated. This all on the heels of the Prime Minister of Spain stating, “An emboldened Israeli Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu aims to inflict on Lebanon the same destruction and suffering that was committed in Gaza" while addressing the Spanish Parliament only three weeks earlier. And currently, southern Lebanon continues experiencing mass destruction of villages and towns, coupled with assertions by the IDF that they have occupied areas of Southern Lebanon indefinatly.

The continued usage of the Dahiya Doctrine as a military strategy has been devastating, breaching every principle of international law and moral principles governing the protection of civilians in wartime. To Israel, civilian infrastructure in Lebanon and Gaza, is treated interchangeably with military targets. Women, children, elderly, the ill, and many innocent men have unnecessarily and violently lost their lives. Journalists have been murdered in the hundreds, hospital staff have been victims due to countless targeting of medical facilities resulting in the collapsing of medical systems. Humanitarian workers and civilian first responders have been killed in large numbers, including in reported “double-tap” strikes where a second strike hits after an initial attack, endangering responders. In October 2025, OCHA reported at least 562 aid workers killed in Gaza since October 2023.

The suffering endured by Palestinians and Lebanese goes beyond words, with extension to Syria and Iran. Israel, by strategic choice, has organized its military might around the disproportionate, intentional choice to mass slaughter civilians and flatten living quarters to achieve its military and political gains. 

Why the Dahiya Doctrine Matters to the United States

The United States has entangled its military spending and national security policy to support Israel's military for decades. The result is complicity of vast crimes against humanity and genocide, supporting military tactics that erode rules-based world order, and a reality starkly against American interests. The Dahiya Doctrine, alongside continued U.S. support of a government that employs such tactics against civilians, only deepens the gap between the U.S. professed commitments to human rights, human security, and actual policy in practice. The continued unconditional support of Israel only fragments our world further, damages American values and interests, and leaves far too many innocent lives lost or unnecessarily altered forever. 

Tamara Sharifov, LCSW, Legislative Analyst

Tamara Sharifov is a Legislative Analyst at A New Policy, as well as a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with advanced expertise in clinical psychology. Her work also spans the humanitarian field, conflict resolution, global affairs, and Middle East policy, bringing a multidisciplinary perspective to issues of conflict, human security, and policy development.

Tamara holds a Master’s degree in Clinical Social Work from University of Chicago and a second Master’s degree in International Conflict Management and Resolution from the Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies at University of San Diego.

Next
Next

Arms for Normalization: How S. 4219 Uses Defense Cooperation to Bypass Palestinian Self Determination